<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Revolutionary use of Slashtags, new microsyntax for Twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://workingviral.com/slashtags/2009/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://workingviral.com/slashtags/2009</link>
	<description>Thinking un-conventional</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 13:42:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1-alpha</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://workingviral.com/slashtags/2009/comment-page-1#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 16:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workingviral.com/?p=86#comment-163</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the write up, Nicola.

I&#039;ve been pleasantly surprised at how both my little conventions have caught on — what was once just a little trick that I used myself became much bigger when I explained what, why, and how I was doing it!

As for your proposal to add /like... I think you should start by using this convention and see if it makes sense to people, and if anyone starting imitating you. I&#039;d also add your proposal to the microsyntax wiki:

http://microsyntax.pbworks.com

One point I&#039;ll make about slashtags and pointers is just that: they&#039;re intended to *point* at something else. In other words, they take an indirect object — whether an author, a recipient, or a source (among others). /like breaks that convention.

I wonder if it wouldn&#039;t be more readable to just add something like &quot;*like*&quot; to the end of your tweet? Or even just use a hashtag? (#like)

In any case, feel free to add it to the wiki — and see if anyone else picks it up. Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the write up, Nicola.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been pleasantly surprised at how both my little conventions have caught on — what was once just a little trick that I used myself became much bigger when I explained what, why, and how I was doing it!</p>
<p>As for your proposal to add /like&#8230; I think you should start by using this convention and see if it makes sense to people, and if anyone starting imitating you. I&#8217;d also add your proposal to the microsyntax wiki:</p>
<p><a href="http://microsyntax.pbworks.com" rel="nofollow">http://microsyntax.pbworks.com</a></p>
<p>One point I&#8217;ll make about slashtags and pointers is just that: they&#8217;re intended to *point* at something else. In other words, they take an indirect object — whether an author, a recipient, or a source (among others). /like breaks that convention.</p>
<p>I wonder if it wouldn&#8217;t be more readable to just add something like &#8220;*like*&#8221; to the end of your tweet? Or even just use a hashtag? (#like)</p>
<p>In any case, feel free to add it to the wiki — and see if anyone else picks it up. Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gli slashtags su Twitter &#124; .iFABIOLALLI</title>
		<link>http://workingviral.com/slashtags/2009/comment-page-1#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Gli slashtags su Twitter &#124; .iFABIOLALLI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 00:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workingviral.com/?p=86#comment-9</guid>
		<description>[...] Ho avuto modo questa sera di parlare qualche minuto con @NicolaGreco dopo aver letto il suo post in italiano relativo agli slashtags e lo stesso, approfondito, anche in inglese sul sito WorkingViral. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ho avuto modo questa sera di parlare qualche minuto con @NicolaGreco dopo aver letto il suo post in italiano relativo agli slashtags e lo stesso, approfondito, anche in inglese sul sito WorkingViral. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://workingviral.com/slashtags/2009/comment-page-1#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 23:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workingviral.com/?p=86#comment-8</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by nicolagreco: Revolutionary use of Slashtags - a new microsyntax for Twitter http://is.gd/5lXg4 #slashtags /cc @chrismessina...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by nicolagreco: Revolutionary use of Slashtags &#8211; a new microsyntax for Twitter <a href="http://is.gd/5lXg4" rel="nofollow">http://is.gd/5lXg4</a> #slashtags /cc @chrismessina&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicola Greco</title>
		<link>http://workingviral.com/slashtags/2009/comment-page-1#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicola Greco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 23:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workingviral.com/?p=86#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Ehy Chris! Thanks for commenting.
Thanks for the suggesions.

For /like I point the user it&#039;s same as RT or /via I use it when i retweet a post because I like it:

&lt;blockquote&gt;I love nutella #nutella /like @nicolagreco&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Now it should make sense :)
Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ehy Chris! Thanks for commenting.<br />
Thanks for the suggesions.</p>
<p>For /like I point the user it&#8217;s same as RT or /via I use it when i retweet a post because I like it:</p>
<blockquote><p>I love nutella #nutella /like @nicolagreco</p></blockquote>
<p>Now it should make sense :)<br />
Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Messina</title>
		<link>http://workingviral.com/slashtags/2009/comment-page-1#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Messina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 16:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workingviral.com/?p=86#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the write up, Nicola.

I&#039;ve been pleasantly surprised at how both my little conventions have caught on — what was once just a little trick that I used myself became much bigger when I explained what, why, and how I was doing it!

As for your proposal to add /like... I think you should start by using this convention and see if it makes sense to people, and if anyone starting imitating you. I&#039;d also add your proposal to the microsyntax wiki:

http://microsyntax.pbworks.com

One point I&#039;ll make about slashtags and pointers is just that: they&#039;re intended to *point* at something else. In other words, they take an indirect object — whether an author, a recipient, or a source (among others). /like breaks that convention.

I wonder if it wouldn&#039;t be more readable to just add something like &quot;*like*&quot; to the end of your tweet? Or even just use a hashtag? (#like)

In any case, feel free to add it to the wiki — and see if anyone else picks it up. Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the write up, Nicola.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been pleasantly surprised at how both my little conventions have caught on — what was once just a little trick that I used myself became much bigger when I explained what, why, and how I was doing it!</p>
<p>As for your proposal to add /like&#8230; I think you should start by using this convention and see if it makes sense to people, and if anyone starting imitating you. I&#8217;d also add your proposal to the microsyntax wiki:</p>
<p><a href="http://microsyntax.pbworks.com" rel="nofollow">http://microsyntax.pbworks.com</a></p>
<p>One point I&#8217;ll make about slashtags and pointers is just that: they&#8217;re intended to *point* at something else. In other words, they take an indirect object — whether an author, a recipient, or a source (among others). /like breaks that convention.</p>
<p>I wonder if it wouldn&#8217;t be more readable to just add something like &#8220;*like*&#8221; to the end of your tweet? Or even just use a hashtag? (#like)</p>
<p>In any case, feel free to add it to the wiki — and see if anyone else picks it up. Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
